At GMP Law, we have extensive experience in class action lawsuits, amplifying the voices of individuals who have experienced similar harms or losses.
Gerard Malouf & Partners Manage Cases For Clients Across All Areas Of Personal Injury Law, Inheritance Disputes And Superannuation Disputes.
Gerard Malouf & Partners Have Provided Friendly, Experienced Legal Advice To Communities Across Australia For Over 35 Years. Our Personal Injury Lawyers Have Taken On Ten’s Of Thousands Of Cases And We Are Proud To Have Won Billions Of Dollars For Our Clients.
Read Our Latest Articles, Case Studies Or Commonly Asked Questions Concerning Your Legal Claims And Compensation Law.
If you’ve been harmed by someone’s actions, you might be wondering who can be held responsible. In some cases, it’s not just the individual who caused the harm that can be held liable – their employer or another related party might also be responsible under a legal concept called ‘vicarious liability.’
This article aims to help you understand what vicarious liability is, how it might apply to your situation, and what you need to know if you’re considering making a personal injury claim.
Quick Links
Vicarious liability is a legal principle that holds one party responsible for the actions or omissions of another party. Typically, this applies in situations where there’s a special relationship between the two parties, such as:
Under vicarious liability, even if an employer or principal wasn’t directly involved in the wrongful act, they can still be held legally responsible for the actions of their employee or agent.
You might have a claim involving vicarious liability if:
It’s important to note that the exact requirements can vary depending on your jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case.
To help you understand how vicarious liability might apply in real-life situations, let’s look at some examples.
Employer-employee relationship | A delivery driver for a local pizza chain causes a car accident while making a delivery, injuring another motorist in a motor vehicle accident. The pizza company could be held vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence because the accident occurred while the driver was performing job-related duties.
The company could be liable because:
|
Church-clergy relationship | In a recent high-profile case in Sydney, a church (the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Saint Maron) was held vicariously liable for the actions of a priest who sexually abused a child (an institutional abuse claim).
The court found that the church was responsible because:
|
Hospital-doctor relationship | A surgeon makes a critical error during an operation, causing severe complications for the patient. The hospital could be held vicariously liable for the surgeon’s mistake as part of a medical negligence claim.
The hospital may be liable because:
|
School-teacher relationship | A teacher fails to properly supervise students during a field trip, resulting in a student getting injured. The school could be held vicariously liable for the teacher’s professional negligence.
The school may be liable because:
|
Security company-guard relationship | A security guard at a shopping mall uses excessive force while apprehending a suspected shoplifter, causing injury. The security company could be held vicariously liable for the guard’s actions, failing their duty of care.
The security guard may be liable because:
|
Understanding vicarious liability is crucial because it can significantly impact your personal injury claim:
By holding a company or organisation liable, you might have access to greater financial resources for compensation. In the aforementioned 2024 case against the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Saint Maron, the plaintiff was awarded the sum of $1,480,251.65 jointly and separately from the first and second defendants.
It encourages organisations to take responsibility for the actions of their employees or agents.
The threat of vicarious liability often motivates companies to implement better training and safety protocols.
It can provide a sense of justice, especially in cases where the individual wrongdoer may not have the means to compensate you adequately.
While vicarious liability can be a powerful legal tool, these claims can present unique challenges:
You’ll need to establish that a relevant relationship (like employer-employee) existed at the time of the incident.
You’ll have to show that the harmful act occurred within the scope of the person’s employment or agency.
If the person who caused harm was an independent contractor rather than an employee, it can be more difficult to establish vicarious liability.
In some cases, complex corporate structures can make it challenging to determine which entity should be held vicariously liable.
Some jurisdictions have laws that limit vicarious liability in certain situations.
In Australia, while the general principles of vicarious liability are similar across the country, there can be some variations in how they are applied.
The concept of vicarious liability has been evolving, with recent court decisions providing more clarity on its application. One significant case is the High Court of Australia’s decision in CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Shokman [2023] HCA 21.
The case, decided in August 2023, provides important insights into how courts interpret vicarious liability:
This decision highlights the complexity of determining when an employer can be held responsible for an employee’s actions. Especially when those actions occur outside of direct work duties.
In the same judgement, the justices set out that there are three different concepts that are often confused with vicarious liability.
These are:
Understanding what applies to your case is important to pursue a vicarious liability claim. Our team of lawyers can examine your case and best direct you.
If vicarious liability applies to your situation, it could affect your claim in a few ways:
At GMP Law, we understand the complexities of vicarious liability claims and the impact they can have on your life.
We offer compassionate, personalised legal representation, guiding you through every step of the claims process. Our expertise in this nuanced area of law allows us to build strong cases, negotiate effectively with companies and their insurers, and advocate fiercely for your rights in court if necessary.
If you’ve been harmed due to someone’s actions while they were working or acting as an agent for another party, don’t face this challenging time alone. Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Your rights matter, and we’re here to ensure they’re protected.
Generally, the company is only liable for actions that occur within the scope of employment. Meaning, they would have to be on duty and working. However, there can be exceptions, such as if the employment created the opportunity for the wrongful act.
Vicarious liability typically doesn’t apply to independent contractors. However, as always, there are exceptions, such as if the company retained a high degree of control over the contractor’s work.
Yes, there are time limits (called limitation periods) for making personal injury claims, including those involving vicarious liability. These vary by state and the type of claim, typically ranging from three to six years.
Yes, in many cases you can pursue a claim against both the individual who caused the harm as well as their employer, principal or the institution.
As GMP Law's Managing Partner, David Cossalter is a seasoned legal expert specialising in complex personal injury cases. With over 20 years of experience, he prioritises client care while delivering exceptional results. He focuses on Wills and Estates litigation, Class Actions, and Public Liability.
Your location is currently:
Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...